Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, PESHAWAR versus ABDUL WAHEED

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Service of ad hoc appointments, termination of political appointments Leps in the post of service of public servants were abolished due to non-compliance of appointment procedures. Was gone Appointments were required due to political and external pressures The service tribunal set aside the suspension order and government employees were reinstated on the grounds that the appointing authority had, at any stage, given its free mind at the initial appointment. Was implemented and other authorities issued by the administration were instructed that the appointment of public servants was made without adhering to the prescribed procedure and that there was no further requirement that the appointment of public servants. Perform by the competent authority if the proposed action is by the relevant authority, civil Unprotected employees could not be held responsible for being responsible and responsible for the work performed by a competent authority, which resulted in government employees being employed for more than ten years. And they have lost all their opportunities. Get a new appointment elsewhere when they become ineligible due to excessive pressure. The bread-earners were acting mechanically without any realm in the appointment of their families, and therefore, due to the serious and mechanical actions of the civil servants, they could not be bothered, the Supreme Court approved the service tribunal. Refused to interfere with the decision. The authority did not comply with the law, the authorities terminated the services of civil servants female advocates from Shedani sharif lawyer