Find a Lawyer

COLLECTOR, CUSTOMS AND CENTRAL EXCISE, PESHAWAR versus ABDUL WAHEED

Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) Ad hoc service, elimination of political appointments Applicability of appointment of non-government employees The services of public servants were terminated because they were not appointed on merit. was done. Instead, the appointment was made due to political and external pressures ordered by the service tribunal to terminate the job and the government employees were reinstated on the basis that the appointing authority had at any stage made the initial appointment. I did not apply my free mind. Other authority issued by the administration directed that the appointment of public servants was made without following the prescribed procedure and they were no longer required to qualify for ad hoc appointments by the competent authority of the government employees. If the prescribed procedure was not followed by the relevant authority, it could not be held responsible for civil servants being held responsible and responsible for the work performed by the competent authority. Because of this, government employees have served him for more than ten years and he All your chances have been lost. Appoint somewhere else because they were ineligible for being older. The Supreme Court has raised concerns that if government employees were to be removed, then treating each of them as public servants would create problems in the society. His family members were working mechanically without the knowledge of the bread earners, therefore, government employees faced serious and mechanical tasks. property advocate from Mithi lawyer