Find a Lawyer

GUL TIAZ KHAN versus THE STATE

In Article 164 Constitutional Evidence (10 of 1984), Arts 37, 38 and 39 confer upon the courts a large responsibility of voluntary nature, whether the confession was voluntary and true, whether the confession was directly or indirectly confession, intimidation, or promise. Was the result of An individual's authority, it will not be considered voluntary. There were two different terms regarding voluntary and true confession and each of them has its own significance. A confession which was voluntary was admissible in evidence, even in its contents it was wrong. May be. best advocate from Daulat Pur lawyer