Find a Lawyer

FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN versus NOOR JAMAL

RR 2 (4), 3 (b) and 6 Service Tribunals Act (LXXV of 1973), Failure to make appropriate inquiry into the re-enactment of section 4 reversal A civil servant was dismissed on charges of corruption, In fact, investigations into two related investigations revealed that the department had made allegations against the civil servant and, on the basis of such inquiry reports, the major penalty for dismissal of the job was declared to be a public servant, on the contrary, Investigations by the Federal Investigation Agency were excused because there was no material available against him. A. His service tribunal allowed the appeal and the civil servant was reinstated. In the case of major fines, a proper inquiry should be conducted in accordance with R6 of 1973 of the Public Employees (Utilities and Discipline) Rules, which would require a criminal officer to issue a defense notice after issuing a show cause notice and The opportunity for a personal hearing was to be provided, and if the allegations were proved in the routine investigation, they would be punished, which was for good reason, the decision passed by the service tribunal, and in accordance with the law laid down by the Supreme Court. Nor was there any misrepresentation of material evidence or reading it, and the facts were not misrepresented. Or was involved in the decision of the law service tribunal, the appeal was dismissed by the Supreme Court inheritance advocates near Mir Ali lawyer