Section 12 (2) and AXXIII R1 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Returning the Affected Case Fraud, the applicant alleges that his brother (defendant) ordered withdrawal of the case. Have put aside the case and have requested restitution. Representing it before the Duty Judge, his ownership would be returned to him and his signature was obtained, after which the Duty Judge dismissed the request without having any inquiry into the matter, about which the Appellate Court The revision confirmed that the Judicial Petitioner was unmarried and the defendant was his brother, filed a lawsuit to challenge the Gift Order, which denied that he had given his property gift in favor of the respondents. But a date was set before the duty judge in this case. When his statement was recorded, the petitioner was entitled to provide proof of how his statement was received as a result of the trial court's dismissal of his trial. It was stated that the petitioner's statement shows that he has appeared in court and recorded his statement, the High Court ignored the trial court's view, accepted the constitutional petition and set aside the controversial order. Declaring the trial court to be without legal authority to instruct the trial court to decide the plea after setting up the cases and recording the evidence of both parties.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
