Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE ANWAR versus HABIB UR REHMAN

Section 13 Landlord's Personal Needs Personally, the landlord was the owner of a multi-storey building, with a dispute over occupying the shop on the first floor, upon request of the landlord's removal. The ground floor was not alleged to have occupied another store in the landlord, especially since the landlord had been insisting for over 15 years that the disputed shop was a good one and It is more suitable for business, being located on the lower floor than the shops on the second floor, it was better that both courts failed to give proper weight to the choice of the landlord and the suitability of the shop according to its need. And did not give any valid reason for it. Suspicion of Landlord's Extreme Personal Needs Before Landlord Receives Negligence, Lower Floor and Vacation Injections Petition Reporting or Withdrawal Request Before and immediately on another tenant at the same rent The giving could not conclude that the landlord did not have a personal need for a disputed shop that had to be determined. The shop was a good fit for her needs. The landlord, who was not occupying any of the premises in the premises, had proved that the tenant-occupying shop was well-intentioned to run his business, with both the courts downed the landlord. The only refusal to grant was based on the agreements and estimates and against the facts available on the record, the orders passed by both the courts were set aside and shown to the tenant. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Ghazi lawyer