RETD. DR. MUHAMMAD IQBAL versus DEFENCE HOUSING AUTHORITY, LAHORE
Article 199 Constitutional Application Civil Service Adhoc Appointment The Employment Extension Petitioner, who was employed as an ad-hoc based medical officer for a fixed term, suspended the letter issued by the respondent authority in his constitutional application under which Requested further extension of service and allotment. The applicant claimed that although he was appointed on an ad hoc basis for a fixed term, his services were extended from time to time and he completed five years of his employment. Under Section 25 (2) of the Defense Housing Authority Lahore Order No. 26, the alternative way of appealing the authority and the failure to make a second appeal from the Executive Board of the Authority was obtained in the service of regularity. The applicant, but it was not used by the applicant and did not specify how it was stated that the applications could not be effective, even in the disclosure of any enforceable right Was unsuccessful because he was never a regular employee of the authority, dismissing the employee's constitutional request from the High Court with an observation that he could benefit from its alternative methods.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
