Find a Lawyer

ZIA-UL-ISLAM versus AHMED SAEED

Section 15 (1) (7) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), after hearing the preliminary arguments against the Appeal Authority against the Article I99 Signing Order, the Appellate Authority reopened the landlord for a petition filed by the landlord's lawyer. Directed to issue admission notice. 12 2 2002 was filed and orders were set for 14 14 2002 Appellate Authority acknowledged the regular hearing appeal on 14 2 2002 and decided the main appeal without allowing the parties to argue, but The appellate authority relied on the reported decision; the book did not show any such decision. The fact of the matter is that the appellate authority has decided to appeal in favor of the tenant appellate authority. So that there was an urgency and animosity in the proceedings, thus violating the fundamentals of judicial proceedings. That is, justice should not only be done, but it should be done, and that no person should be condemned that the heard High Court will accept the constitutional petition and set aside the unlawful order, thereby affecting the tenant. Appeals filed by will be considered pending before the appellate authority, which will be decided after hearing the parties. tax advocates from Gari Habibullah lawyer