HAROON GUL versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) sentenced the accused and the deceased were living in exactly the same area, although the motives set by the prosecution did not prove on record. Similarly, the accused did not present any evidence against the Holy Prophet (PBUH) about the alleged dishonesty committed by the deceased. The accused also said that the victim repeated the same. Yes, but no one came forward to substantiate this statement, that's how the prosecution was established. The trial against the accused High Court was given by the trial court for various reasons for maintaining the sentence awarded to the accused. The illegal decisions guaranteed by the Supreme Court cannot identify any illegal or legal weakness according to which the appeal was refused.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
lawer from fb area from Bhera lawyer
