MESSRS U.S. APPARELS AND TEXTILE (PVT.) LIMITED versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Customs Customs General Order of the Offices of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance of 1999 Customs General Order 1999 1999 of (return of goods used in the manufacture of goods) Section X, which was exported without any The deduction from the payment of duty draw was justified, according to the reason - a unique case of mismanagement by the Export Collector where the authorities did not pay full waiver and did not disclose the reasons for the deduction, resulting in extraordinary claims payment delayed. Suffered, and when he finally approved the side claims, the actual payment was not made on this illogical and nasty pretext. It was reported that the claim for refunds of deductions made in 1997 was given less priority five years later, in 2002 the Federal Tax Ombudsman directed the Central Board of Revenue to approve it, illegally, without reasonable grounds, and The Department of Exports, which delayed the approval of the actual surplus claims for a reasonable period of time, or two years and, in fact, wished to be paid well after a gap of about five to five years. When duty drop claims are deducted on any account, a notice explaining the reasons is issued with a lesser amount check. It should go and payable claims should be processed, approved and paid on a priority basis because there is nothing to do. According to these claims, justification is a low priority
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
