NAEEM SHAH versus THE STATE
Sections 2 (s) and 156 (1) (89) of the documents, which were allegedly presented by the accused related to the vehicle, including the recovery memo, were not presented to the trial court despite the prosecution in this regard. Opportunities were provided to witnesses. Never been brought on record, could not be considered for prosecution or against, thirteen days after the accused's arrest was recorded, the confessional statement will be denied. His statement was voluntary prior to the arrest of the suspect, a large part of which was illegal because the accused did not own the vehicles during the court proceedings which resulted in the confiscation of the vehicles.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
divorce advocates from Daur lawyer