INAYATULLAH versus THE STATE
Section 9 (c) defines the complaint of evidence on which the accused was prosecuted. The investigation was not conducted and the prosecution witness, who allegedly produced the recovered drugs, was not interrogated during the investigation as it was the person who had been handed over to the Inquiring Officer prosecution from the date of his recovery. Could prove safe drug delivery. KG opium was recovered, but 4950 grams were produced and the prosecutor did not cause 50 grams of shortage which could not be ascertained whether he had property or a sample was sent, he admitted, though He had taken possession of the case, but was not authorized to arrest the accused or affect his recovery.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Shujabad lawyer