Find a Lawyer

MST. BASRAJ BEGUM versus BAHADUR SHER

Section 42 of the Qanun Shahadat (Sun 10, 1984, of 1984), at the request of the bride-to-be, the plaintiff in favor of the plaintiffs in Articles 117 and 120 denied the sale by the plaintiff's claim that the women's dispute was That they were normal. Witnessing the change in sales by the executive companies, nor to say that there was nothing in the files to suggest that fraud was committed against women, the case was partially decided in favor of the plaintiff but the appellate court appealed. Allowed and the case is completely dismissed in his favor. The plaintiffs had dismissed the requests made in the written statement under which they refused to enter into any dealings with the plaintiffs and refused to receive any consideration on the sale. The defendants then contended that they had influenced the controversial variable as a minor witness and not as a shopkeeper. The plaintiff's women were married and lived with their husbands. The defendants then had no opportunity to lift the thumb, press the variable as a minor witness and allow their husbands or other male members of their family to remain behind. Any malicious writing or non-recitation of evidence was indicated to make the appellate court's decision baseless and the order passed by the appellate court was upheld. solicitors from Kacha Khooh lawyer