Article 409 Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) The exact date and time of the alleged violation of trust by a civil servant, or banker, merchant or agent and corruption. The Criminal Report Prosecution did not mention that the accused, in association with the other co-accused, seized the material available in public stock, but there was no evidence from the prosecution in this case. The accused cannot be convicted under Section 409, PPC. The case was not satisfied with the prosecution through well-known evidence; neither the accused participant was named in the complaint in connection with the alleged misconduct or illegal property disposal, nor was his name a criminal report I was mentioned. He was also charged with being one of the culprits in the inquiry conducted by the investigating officers and was not found to be involved in any other crime. The investigation revealed that the prosecutor's witness had not presented any reasonable arguments, nor was there any solid material / evidence / evidence on record to link the accused to the commission of the crime. The alleged technical report was not prepared in the presence of the accused's copy, which was not presented to the accused at the time of his statement under Section 2342, CRPC, which could not be used in the prosecution case against the accused, It lacks sufficient witnesses, which could be the basis for convicting any accused, as it did not go beyond the board. He took action against the department
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
