SHAUKAT ALI versus THE STATE
Section 365A / 302/34 / 109A Anti-Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 7 and 6 request the review of the accused who claimed to be his own child for transferring the case to the Juvenile Court. , The Anti-Terrorism Court considered the specific design or purpose of the immovable order by the provisions of section 6 (1) (b) or (c) and its case with the FIR was not understandable. Therefore, none of the terrorists considered under Section 6 of this section was. According to the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997, it also had to be tried by a court of common jurisdiction over the youth of an accused in the forum being prosecuted, therefore, it was irrelevant as the matter was now to be referred to the court. Was. Common jurisdiction and if the accused was a minor, such a court would have to be a juryanal court and no other court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Swat lawyer
