GHULAM QADIR MAHESAR versus THE STATE
Definitions of Articles 9/10 and 14 No No reliable and credible evidence was recorded on the record to indicate the accused's involvement in the commission of the crime, for which the two guards charged the availability of a private guard. Was. In order to improve his case and to weigh the evidence of the witnesses by the trial court, the gross abortion of justice led to the abortion of justice by the trial court over such faulty evidence. The evidence was not satisfactorily excluded by the prosecution. , Considered under section 14 of the National Accountability Ordinance, 1999, could be charged with non-exchange for dismissing the charges, the accused also kept records of receipts for the supply of wheat at the wheat procurement centers. There were. Negotiating a prosecution case where government officials were found to be corrupt and dishonest, then due to their corruption and malpractice, they could not be made victims of scapegoat against the others, or convicted criminals. Was acquitted of circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Hala lawyer