Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD FEROZE MALIK versus NADIR ALI

Sections 9 and 18 of the West Pakistan Land Revenue Act (XVII of 1967), Section 163 Holdings Stability Review confirmed the village's Assistant Commissioner / Collector's Stability Scheme, after such confirmation, in favor of the defendants in relation to the allotted land. During the ongoing stay of the occupation, the petitioner's appeal against the order of the collector was accepted by the Additional Commissioner and a review by the Member, Board of Revenue against the order of the Additional Commissioner was considered, the petitioner against the order of the Member. The review petition was filed by the Board of Revenue Petitioner requesting that he stay as the owner of the disputed land. In possession of the land, the delivery of its possession to the respondents was irresponsible under the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1960; the respondents' argument was that they were entitled to possession of the land allotted to the claim of stability and applicant. Were. The said land was the Boss unless the order was approved by the Member, the Board of Revenue was not retained in the amendment. First, because land disputes in the dispute were entered into after purchase by the same land applicant. Second, the applicant continued to occupy the said land even after confirming the stability. Thirdly, the sale was completed in all aspects of the law and under this the right of the applicant was created. Fourth, those rights were not affected, and those who were allotted land also had to be in control. Fifth, the applicant had to step into the shoes of the respondents on the basis of the sale and under this the applicant was entitled to his possession. The sixth thing is that there is a masculinity between the parties online advocate from Nawab Shah lawyer