MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus THE STATE
Section 302 (b) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Art 85 (3) arguments were that additional judicial confession and last-seen evidence depended on the violation of good principles on the subject. Serious contradictions in the evidence were ignored, resulting in serious prejudice to the accused, and statements of interesting witnesses were relied upon without independent cohesion, allowing the accused to appeal the aforesaid convictions.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
online advocate from Manga Mandi lawyer
