Find a Lawyer

BASHARAT ALI versus SPECIAL JUDGE, ANTI-TERRORISM COURT-II, GUJRANWALA--

Section 6 [such as the Counter Terrorism (Amendment) Ordinance (substituted by XXIX 2001)], the Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/324/452/436/148/149 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Following the completion of the terrorist probe application, there was ongoing killings between the parties formed in the FIR and the complaining party's refusal to compromise with the accused party in a recent case of murderous assault challan in this case. , Before the applicant of the Anti-Terrorism Court, before filing an application before the trial court under Section 23, Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 Addiction was asked to move, which it was claimed that terrorism is not included in the case as described in section 6, Anti-Terrorism Act. 1997 But the application was rejected. Petitioner pleaded that the circumstances of this case did not attract the definition of terrorism contained in Section 6 of the said Act despite the barbaric proceedings. y depicted by criminals and the resulting horror, trauma, fear and insecurity created by criminals through barbarism, was not a matter of terrorism as the purpose of the alleged crimes was personal enmity. There was nothing and private retaliation and incitement was not to increase or threaten the government by the accused or to destabilize the society at large or to pursue any sectarian purpose. The accused did not reveal or disclose any of the parties' intentions or designs. As in section 6 (1) (b) or (c), the provisions of the Anti Terrorism Act 1997 have been considered, and as such, famous high court advocate from Landi Kotal lawyer