FUNFAIR (PVT.) LIMITED versus KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Article 52A Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 9 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for allotment of facilities plot for use of commercial cum amusement park authority, after the lease is executed in favor of the applicant. The permit to commercialize the plot is subject to payment of the necessary charges, which he later allegedly submitted to the authority and canceled his allotment. The applicant said that after the lease, a right in the RAM had accumulated in his favor, which could not be bothered. Plots of arbitrary and unilateral accuracy can be considered welfare plots from the documents on record, and then investigating and examining them as contentious questions poses the status of the plot after that point. Was necessary to give the final result. In fact, other issues arising out of it and the law applicable to it, can be considered and decided for a welfare project. The park was a public property owned by the rights of millions of citizens. In view of the interests and environmental issues, a larger aircraft was required to be considered and such matter was outside the scope of application under Article 199. The Constitution and the same can be dismissed in a properly constituted proceeding before the Civil Court High Court cancels the Constitution.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
best law firm from Barbar Loi lawyer