Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Trusted direct lawyer access
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Unlock direct contact details for up to 10 lawyers so you can call or WhatsApp the right legal professional and move your matter forward with confidence.

☎ Phone and WhatsApp access ⚖ Verified lawyer directory 🔒 Secure payment
⚡ Connect with 10 Lawyers for Rs 1,000
Pay once. Open contact numbers for lawyers matching your legal need.

SHAFIQUE AHMED versus GOVERNMENT OF PUNJAB


Preamble, Sections 37 and 5 of the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance (XXXII of 1962), Preamble University Act of Punjabi University (IX of 1973), Sections 5 and 7 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973) Arts 4, 25 and 185 (3) The destiny of the applicants (medical colleges students) of the K-wire Health Sciences Ordinance, 2002, was that the affiliation of the University of Health Sciences Ordinance, 2002 was a violation of the Pakistan Medical and Dental Council Ordinance, 1962 and a letter issued by it. The Vice-Chancellor, University of Health Sciences generally violated the spirit of the University of Health Sciences Ordinance, 2002 and Article 37. That the provisions relating to affiliation and disqualification were a violation of the fundamental rights contained in the Constitution. That the two medical colleges were exempt from affiliation and violation of Articles 4 and 25 of the Constitution. That section 37 of the Ordinance had no previous application. Regarding misuse of medical colleges, this law was a violation of the Punjab University Act 1973 and the calendars and applicants created under it have the right to be examined by the University of Punjab for valid principles. To do Expected accuracy Despite the fact that the University of Health Sciences Ordinance, 2002 and the High Court decision were challenged by only 4 of the 6000 medical colleges and any college affiliated to the University of Health Sciences filed a complaint Did not , University of Health Sciences Ordinance, 2002 was not only a valid implementation but was not a constitutional supremacy and the expression of the substance was not denied because the time used in the notification made it clear that the exemption was exempt.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
how to become a advocate from Wahi hassain lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.