INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2110/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 14TH FEBRUARY, 2003. versus INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 2110/LB OF 2002, DECIDED ON 14TH FEBRUARY, 2003.
66 and 59 inspection of the Additional Commissioner to review the order of the Deputy Commissioner approved under Section 59A of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1979, by the Additional Commissioner inspecting under section 59A of an Income Tax Ordinance Such an order was banned. Recognizing the accuracy of 1979, the diagnosis was finalized on 30, 2001, and the diagnosis was banned for approximately 2 years. As a time-bound diagnosis, in the eyes of the law there was no diagnostic order that could not be subject to the jurisdiction of the reviewer by the inspector's additional commissioner, in the event of a time-out The diagnosis will not be considered in the field and no action will be taken. Thereafter, it will have no legal basis, which was inspected by the Additional Commissioner under Section 66A of the Ordinance, canceled by the Appellate Tribunal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous high court advocate from Mustang lawyer
