SARDAR GUL BADSHAH versus MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE
The effect of the necessary party passed in the amendment by the Commissioner of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Interim Constitution Act (VIII of 444), Section 42 (2), was appointed by the Member, Board of Revenue. And the Member, the order passed by the Board of Revenue - Revenue was challenged by the petitioner without enforcing the Board of Revenue before the High Court because the party / respondent High Court dismissed the writ petition on the ground that The Board of Revenue, which was an essential party, was not implemented The Board of Revenue had not canceled the necessary party contention, as it was clearly recorded in section 6 (3) of the Azad Jammu and Kashmir Board of Revenue Act, 1993 that any order was passed or any order was passed. Approved - By a Member, the Board of Revenue shall be deemed to be the Order or Order of the Board of Revenue, in any case, the High Court was constituted not to exclude the writ petition from the required party. Enforcement
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates contact from Battagram lawyer
