Find a Lawyer

ENGINEER JAMEEL AHMED MALIK versus PAKISTAN ORDNANCE FACTORIES BOARD, WAH CANTT

Rr 2 (4) and 4 (1) (b) (ii) Government Service Rules, 1964, Rr 22 and 29 The mandatory retirement from a service charge against a public servant was that he addressed the press conference and Issued flags criticizing his administration and talked about the latest events in the New World Order and the geopolitical situation, and letters to top officials, including the country's president and prime minister, overlooking the general process in this regard. Addressing a public servant did not deny such facts, but emphasized that what was stated was a valid justification for a public servant expressing his freedom of expression. Within the limits of the circle, the New World Order and live to discuss the latest developments in the political situation, such practice would violate civil servant style of RR 22 and 29 employees. Misconduct in the sense of Rule 2, 4 of the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973 and the Government Employees (Talent and Discipline) Rules, 1973, proved such a charge to the public servant. famous lower court advocate from Pindi gheb lawyer