Find a Lawyer

MOHYUDDIN versus SUPERINTENDENT, NEW CENTRAL JAIL, BAHAWALPUR

Section 10 (3) (4) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Penal Enforcement (Enforcement of the Jewish) Ordinance 1979, the accused found guilty under section 10 (3) by Presidential Order Intelligence Exception is granted. And he was facing an apology for the presidential order, but his request was rejected by the superintendent of prison. ()) The said ordinance did not exist, but was subsequently incorporated, and even after the introduction of section 10 (4) of the Enforcement of Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance, 1979, the accused were not charged. went. Nor was he eventually convicted by the trial court. Even the appellate court did not vary or alter the conviction of the accused from section 10 (3) to section 10 (4). Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance, 1979 In 1979, they were never tried and convicted under Section 10 (4) under the Penalty of Adultery (Enforcement Hodg) Ordinance 1979, not extending the benefit of the accused to an apology. Was without objection to authority. Any power has been alleged, in the circumstances, to be exempt from time to time by presidential orders issued registration advocate from Depal Pur lawyer