Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus ADDITIONAL DISTRICT JUDGE

Section 25 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Welfare cover of minors Welfare and application of a petition filed by the father of a minor under Ward Act 1890 on the grounds that the family court accepted the minor's father. Financially Applicable After the separation, his wife / minor's mother remarried to a man who had no relationship with the minor under the prohibited degree, who was likely to love and love the minor. The father was set by the Court of Appeal. The family court's decision aside and the father's request for custody of minors was dismissed, on the grounds that both children were underage, attached to their mother. That they were enjoying good health, the 6-year-old daughter was studying in school while the younger son was not of school age. That there were fewer children being raised by the mother. That there was no substitute for the love and affection of a real mother. It was the welfare of the most important minor children, and in these circumstances the mother could not be denied only by the grasp that she had married a stranger, irrespective of the age of the minor. The minors were deprived of the parent company Gardens and Wards Act, 1890, and it was not stated that the custody of the juveniles should be made on the basis of the views of various schoolchildren regarding the age or divorce of the minor. Is from The welfare of minors, which would mean their mental, intellectual, moral and spiritual fitness, which was appropriate to the appellate court's decision, was based not only on evidence, but also on reasoning and competent reasoning. when you need a advocate from Panjan Kisan lawyer