HAJI AURANGZEB versus MUSHTAQ AHMAD
Section 540A Constitutional Code (XLV of 1860), Section 337A (ii) / 34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), in court, denied the charge of exoneration. Had gone for The month of July, 2002, when the application for waiver was made in September 2002, does not show that his father, who was a co-accused in the case, had authorized the accused to file an application. Which may be briefly rejected. On this basis, the challan was presented in court in March, 2002 and it took about four months for the accused to move the waiver application before he could go abroad but he could leave without the sanction of immunity. In which the absence of a presiding officer was no guarantee. The manner of the accused who can move the case or at least for his immunity can be obtained by a competent court to obtain appropriate orders within time, but he did not make any such effort to the accused. The claim of immunity had to be physically presented to the court but did not do so. No interference in the injunction was guaranteed. Accordingly, the accused was denied.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
ask a advocate free from Khyber Agency lawyer