AMJAD QAYYUM BABAR versus MUNIM S. MIR, DIRECTOR, EMMS, PRIVATE LIMITED, PESHAWAR
OI, Rr 3, 9 and 10 suits were filed against the non-joiner of the party suit, who was the director of the respective company of the defendant company, in order to recover the money. In this regard, the non-joiner of the necessary party warranty was also excluded in the dispute which was sold by the plaintiff to the defendant by the company, issued by the relevant company and not executed by the plaintiff in their individual capacity. The plaintiff was not guaranteed by the company that issued the warranty, but he was responsible for the repair of the aforementioned machine. Umm run individually sue the plaintiff. Or its defective parts were replaced by the company and not by the defendant. Since the transaction took place between the plaintiff and the company, the warranty was a matter between the plaintiff and the company, but the plaintiff did not bother to appeal to the trial court for an amendment. In spite of the objections raised in connection with the necessary, necessary party to enforce the company as a plaintiff
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
