STATE PETROLEUM REFINING AND PETROCHEMICAL CORPORATION LIMITED versus LATEEF SIDDIQUI
The Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 212 (3) changed the order of dismissal from employment to compulsory retirement, the applicant corporation in the jurisdiction of the service tribunal said, to impose a fine on it. There is no provision of service rules. Employment Retirement - On any employee, the service tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction while responding to the employee's dismissal of the employee's mandatory retirement mandate, the respondent employee acknowledged that the tribunal imposed a mandatory penalty. There was an error In the absence of proof of his guilt in the retirement record. And that the tribunal cannot be converted to any other penalty without designating a dismissal because the Supreme Court allowed the appeal to be considered by the parties without establishing any alliance with the proposed sentence. Is.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
top civil advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer