Find a Lawyer

THE STATE versus NAWAB KHAN SARHADI

The appeal against the charges against section 8 (d) and the 25 accused was that after their discovery, audio cassettes and books were obtained from each of them in a way that made certain sects of Islam into derogatory and derogatory content. Existed and such sectarian hatred was likely to give birth. The trial court, after considering the material available on record, acquitted the accused of possessing audio cassettes and books, not sufficient to prove a crime under the provisions of Section 8 (d) of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997 Dual intentions were provided to attract ingredients, provided for in section 8 (a) of the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997. First, the person whose possession of the material was protected was to be disclosed or published, and secondly, the display and publication were intended to arouse sectarian hatred or, in the present case, the possibility of prosecution. He only showed proof that the audio cassettes and books were safe, but two intentions could not be proved as needed because he had not presented any evidence by the prosecution nor was section 8 of this section. The important components of (d) may be indicated by the evidence brought to the record by the prosecution. After the Anti-Terrorism Act, 1997 was not proved, the trial court properly acquitted the accused in the absence of any illegal interference or irregularity in the trial court's order, saying that there was no interference in this order. Can be advocates from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer