ROIDAD KHAN versus MUTABBAR KHAN
Section 41 & Professional 44 Return of Professional Misconduct Complaints Advocate against whom a complaint of professional misconduct was filed in absentia, the members of the Disciplinary Committee initiated the proceedings and after recording the prior evidence Was sent to the tribunal for final hearing. Upon consideration before the Tribunal, the complainant submitted an application for withdrawal of his complaint on the basis that he recorded the matter in his statement to the Advocate Complainant, in which he confessed that he had filed his The complaint was refunded in full, the lawyer and his grievances have been resolved, not only professional misconduct but other practices of advocacy can be investigated by the Bar Council's Dispensary Committee as well as the Tribunal. Neemi's violation should not be a direct result. The lawyer and client's intimate relationship, but even if it has a remote connection to a lawyer's profession, such as in a case involving a lawyer and trust relationship and the suitor's suit money If removed, it would certainly be inappropriate behavior of a lawyer advocate. The present case was found to be professional misconduct, but in view of the written agreement, the matter was softened and the Advocate was subjected, and he had to be careful in the future and to maintain the dignity of the legal profession both inside and outside the court. Was instructed. , With the cost
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Pind Dadan Khan lawyer