Find a Lawyer

SAJID HUSSAIN versus SABRO REFRIGERATION AND AIRCONDITIONING EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS

Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (22) against the practice of unfair labor practice by employees alleged that their services were They have been terminated because of their trade. The union's activities, which are part of the Employers 'Industrial Relations Ordinance, as part of the Employers' Unlawful Practices Act, 1969 were the applicants who allegedly victimized them because of their trade union activities. Failed to identify trade union activity. On the basis of which they were allegedly dismissed, allegations of wild and illicit labor were not sufficient to prove victim only and enable the matter to be intercepted by the National Industrial Relations Commission when employees The services were terminated because the administration decided that the burden of re-working and logical execution and that the General Services Department had had was canceled and that all employees, including the applicants, were declared surplus applicants. They failed to prove inappropriate labor practices by employers, the nation The Industrial Relations Commission had no jurisdiction to deal with the petition filed by the applicants under Industrial Section 22A (8) (G). The Request for Relations Ordinance, 1969 was dismissed under circumstances female advocates from Pak Pattan Sharif lawyer