MALIK HAMID SAEED versus THE STATE
Section 169, 249A, 439A and 561A of the Penal Code (XLV of 1860), the discharge of the accused's accused under section 162 and the cancellation of section 169 of the Order, were the administrative proceedings of the CCP magistrate and included There will be no money. The Magistrate's recapture of the Order of Discharge may be reversed and the accused may also be summoned by the trial court to face trial FIR, at present, against the accused under Section 43436, PPC. The case was registered and the complainant filed the case during the pre-arrest bail, according to the trial court's impression that the jurisdiction of the area agreed on the non-participation of the accused, if the accused's bail was granted pre-arrest bail. So bail can be granted and the accused was later released under Section 169, CRPC charged, enough. After the time, the petitioners moved to file a case against the complainants under Section 182, they were lodged under Section 182; The information conveyed by the complainant upon the verification of the matter was merely that in view of the existence of the FIR filed by the complainant under Section 6, 6, PPC, a case under section 182 was registered. Can't be done, unless the court comes. It has been concluded that the case against the accused was malicious, false, ridiculous or unreasonable only on the basis of acquittal of the accused under section 696969, the CCP for any reason, the complainant under section 182 Will not be accused of legal proceedings against the PPC Complainant
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
list of advocates from Kamra lawyer