Find a Lawyer

SHAMSHADA versus THE STATE

Clauses 9 (c), 20 and 25 of the Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Section 103, for the purpose of recovering the value of evidence presented by one of the defendants for false involvement in his crime were not understandable. He was unable to explain why the purpose of traveling in a car with a stranger / co-accused was not a hostility or animosity for the prosecution's witnesses to include him with the accused, referring to the huge quantity of sauces and opiates. The arrest was recovered from and the prosecution's witnesses were consistent. The presence and the time and location of the articles and the manner in which they were impacted cannot be believed that the police planted the plant to include the accused in section 103 for allegedly nothing. , CR PC was deleted. Under section 25 of the Act registration advocate from Kala Shah Kaku lawyer