ALL SINDH A/C NON-A/C PRIVATE TRANSPORT EMPLOYEES UNION versus INSPECTOR GENERAL, MOTORWAY POLICE
Section 58, 82 and 97 of the West Pakistan Motor Vehicle Ordinance (XIX of 1965), Section 114 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution petition petitioner's complaint was that the applicant's complaint was stated on the ticket issued despite payment of the fine. By Gia Highway Police, his driving license was not returned, authorities had submitted that the police officers had seized the license properly under sections 58, 82 and 97, of which Western Was read with section 114 of the Pakistan Motor Vehicle Ordinance, 1965. The applicant was that the police officers did not state anywhere that they had reason to believe that the applicant could be absconding or otherwise the petitioner would refrain from serving the applicant, and further claimed. It was reported that the police officers, after obtaining the license, did not admit it in writing. Under Section 114 (3), officials who do not temporarily snatch the applicant's license and issue confession for possession They warned police officers to be cautious in the future. And the next High Court directed the police officers to pay the applicant as per the constitutional request.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Hayatabad lawyer