Find a Lawyer

MUNAWAR HUSSAIN versus ZAHID MALIK, EDITOR-IN-CHIEF, PAKISTAN OBSERVER

Sections 15 and 22A (8) (g) of the National Industrial Relations Commission (Regulations and Duties) Regulations, 1973, Regulation 32 (2) terminate employees' termination of employment against unfair labor practice by employees. Who were alleged to have suffered due to their trade union activities which were related to the extraordinary labor employed by the employees even though they were members of the respective trade union, but failed to establish a single trade union activity. That would hurt employers to the extent that they would get away with it. Their method of torturing an employee cannot be believed in the absence of any credible evidence that the employees were targeted by employers, it was not enough to simply accuse them of wild and illicit labor. This case makes men appropriate for the intervention of the National Industrial Relations Commission. Employee termination act, under the circumstances, could not have any basis for employers to pass on. In the present case, unfair practice with the employees constituted the basic task against which the employee felt inconvenienced from the job. Hui, the National Industrial Relations Commission had no jurisdiction to intervene in this matter as the jurisdiction of the Commission was limited and restricted to limited cases. Charges of unfair labor practice were dismissed and the order issued in favor of the applicant was withdrawn pakistani advocates Talamba lawyer