Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AFZAL WARRAICH versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 96 and 156 (2) Income Tax Rules, 1982, R5 (b) Establishment of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance Office (XXV of 2000), Section 2 (3) Complaint for refund / SC Employee was, demanded for refund under R. Decision regarding the manipulation of 5 (b) notices of Income Tax Rules 1982 for rent-free accommodation was finally filed against the Assessing Officer and additional Accepted for payment of compensation / Assistive Complainant was entitled to additional compensation: late payment complaint was primarily about misconduct by the Assessing Officer The Federal Tax Ombudsman had refused to pass any order against such an Assessing Officer when the financial administration recommended to the Federal Tax Ombudsman that additional compensation be taken on the return of the complainant / estate on 10 May 1999. , Rs 375 and disciplinary proceedings against the Special Officer on the complaint filed by the E-Complainant to receive the Central Board of Revenue. Pakistan, top advocate family court from Hub Inds Estate lawyer