Find a Lawyer

MESSRS ZIA ABBAS & SONS (PVT.) LTD. versus KARACHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, (KDA)

Sections 3, 4 and 2 (6) of the Special Relief Act (of 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Sections 108 (c), I10 and I1 of the Declaration, Masonry Profit and Order Jurisdiction to cancel the lease / allotment under the Sindh Civil Land (Allotment, Conversion and Exchange Cancellation) Ordinance, 2001 against the process of freezing of allotted plots for the plaintiffs. The car was that the plots discussed were allotted in favor of violating the plaintiffs' rules and inadequate considerations that violated the allotment rules of such plots and that Or already disposed of two plots were allotted to four and that was proposed action was in the same regard. The plots available to the plaintiffs further claim that although there was no arrangement for any action to freeze the plots under the Karachi Development Authority's rules or by-laws, the unidentified plots were followed. There was an initial and temporary action for the final cancellation proceedings, after which, according to the decisions of the Government of Sindh, the plaintiffs were provided with appropriate opportunity, that no corruption was intended by the authority and that the allotment should be taken at the relevant time. Was violated by the relevant rules and regulations and that the plot was executed in Karachi Were sold at the prevailing price determined by the Wellness Authority and not at the market value attracted to the present issue of Sindh Urban Land (Allotment, Conversion and Conversion Cancellation) Ordinance, 2001, section 3 of the said ordinance. The clauses of 4 had to be read together, but immigration advocates email from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer