Find a Lawyer

MST. RASHIDA BIBI versus BORDER AREA COMMITTEE

Arts 4 and 199 Constitutional Appeal Forced Land Reinstatement Restoration Law Security Applicants' foregoing military personnel who were allotted land in a dispute that was allotted regularly to the public record The name of the petitioner's complaint, which was the legal heir of the deceased allottee, was that he was forcibly expelled and on the orders of the Authority, the petitioners allotted their predecessor through the Border Area Committee Allotment. Prayed for the restoration of their possession of the property in dispute. The land was regularly scrutinized in a dispute in favor of petitioner's predecessor, and was found to be legal and legitimate by the Order Border Area Committee, though the authority to examine the allotment of the allotment was granted. , But once such power had been exercised by the Committee. , Which concluded that the allotment in favor of the allottee was legal and correct, the re-use of that power would not be in accordance with the legal position on the subject, but rather the abolition of the concept of finalizing the judicial process. To be done, all actions of state officials should have the support of a common law. , In which this action would be deemed to be without jurisdiction and illegal, enjoying the protection of the law and acting in accordance with the law, was the essential right of every citizen, as enshrined in Article 4 of the Constitution, Of importance is the statue of security measures. The individual, in the matter of his life, is a citizen of liberty, honor, dignity and property us immigration advocates from Bat Khela lawyer