Find a Lawyer

MIR GHULAM ABID versus LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER/COLLECTOR, NOW DEPUTY DISTRICT OFFICER (REVENUE), KHAIRPUR

Holders / landlords entitled to additional compensation for the acquisition of section 28A and 54 land were requested to pay them additional compensation under Section 28 Land Acquisition Act, 1894, but refused their request for these reasons. Went because they said the money was not claimed by decree. Individuals with original claims to the rulers and that extra compensation was not approved in court and, according to the court's decision, the plaintiffs / under section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for payment of additional compensation. The landowners were not allowed. Claim additional compensation which he himself was entitled to under the mandate of the law or the court was unable to pay it, it was absolutely irrelevant and did not result in the acquisition of the land, as per the Act of 1894 Under 28A, the holders / landlords were entitled to additional compensation. Implementation of the court while executing the statement filed by the Dictator Hall under the Act of section 28A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, during the execution proceedings containing the claim of 15% surplus compensation annually. Was valid and payable on which he was entitled to claim that he was obliged to pay the surplus. Appellant / order takers, they were ordered to deposit the money within the stipulated period. us immigration advocates from Khoski lawyer