Find a Lawyer

NAEEM KHAN versus THE STATE

Section 497 Provisional Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302/324/148/149 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance (XXII of 2000), Sections 2 (b) and 10 (7) (c), on guaranteeing the child Bail was requested. Because of the crime when he was accused of being 13 years, 4 months and 13 days, the fact that the accused was a child / minor, he did not make him entitled to a discount on bail, in each case. Had to do a self-check. The merits and the court cannot be removed at the request of the minority. The gravity of the crime and other attendance situations should be kept in mind by the court when such judicial justice system ordinance 2000 was used, a special law was enacted to protect it. The rights of those children / minors involved in criminal cases, who are entitled to appropriate privileges as they are elderly, should be freely interpreted in favor of the accused and if such accused is 18 days old It will be less than a year. The child within the definition contained in Section 2 (b) of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000 and, if he is involved in the death penalty, will still be entitled to bail, however, contained in Section (C) of the Exemption. Subject to limitations. 7) Section 10 of the Juvenile Justice System Ordinance, 2000, under which, if the court concludes that reasonable grounds are available to assume that such a child is involved in an offense that, in his opinion, Was serious, disgusting, horrible, cruel, thrilling in character or blowing public morals or he was the last culprit to be sentenced to death or life imprisonment, then he would not be entitled to the present case. famous supreme court advocate from Mingora lawyer