Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD MUSTAQEEM versus THE STATE


Section 497 Immigration Ordinance (XVII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 guaranteed, the grant of the charges against the accused was that he received huge sums from complainants on obtaining a visa for employment with a co-accused, But the accused neither granted them visas nor returned the money. The charges against the accused were attracted to sections 17 and 22 of the Immigration Ordinance 1979 and the sentence fixed under section 17 of the ordinance was five years and for one time under section 22, which could extend to fourteen years. The immigration ordinance provided for alternative penalties for the two provisions. , The 1979 case against the accused, would be outside the prohibited clause in section 497 (1), the CCP accused, who had been behind bars for the past nine months, a former non-criminal, was entitled to bail.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
online advocate from Jalal Pur Jatan lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.