Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD MUSTAQEEM versus THE STATE

Section 497 Immigration Ordinance (XVII of 1979), Sections 17 and 22 guaranteed, the grant of the charges against the accused was that he received huge sums from complainants on obtaining a visa for employment with a co-accused, But the accused neither granted them visas nor returned the money. The charges against the accused were attracted to sections 17 and 22 of the Immigration Ordinance 1979 and the sentence fixed under section 17 of the ordinance was five years and for one time under section 22, which could extend to fourteen years. The immigration ordinance provided for alternative penalties for the two provisions. , The 1979 case against the accused, would be outside the prohibited clause in section 497 (1), the CCP accused, who had been behind bars for the past nine months, a former non-criminal, was entitled to bail. inheritance advocates near Jhatta Bhutta lawyer