EX-ASSISTANT WARRANT OFFICER MUHAMMAD YOUSUF versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections ((xix a), & 73 and Air 108 [, [as amended by the Air Force Ordinance (VIVI XXX of XXVIII)] The Crime of Adultery (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 Under Hood Laws, the defendant claimed that the court marshal was not able to try anyone who served under the Hood Act in the Pak Air Force, for trial of the court martial's competence. The accused, who was serving as an Assistant Warrant Officer in the Pak Air Force, was under the Pakistan Air Force Act 1953. Amendments to the Pak Air Force Act were made through the Pak Air Force (Amendment) Ordinance, 1984. Where the court-martial was empowered to prosecute under the Hodgood Act and the accused was given the right to appeal and revise, give priority to the authority specified in the said act, before any other authority, tribunal or court The jurisdiction was no different. Review, alter, amend, amend or revise an order approved by any officer of the force authorized under the Pakistan Air Force Act 1953.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
