Find a Lawyer

QAZI NISAR AHMED versus MESSRS ISOLUX WATT, GROUP ISOLUX PAKISTAN, LAHORE

A. VII, Rr 2 and 11 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877), suits Articles 42 and 54, for the procurement, order and receipt of money, the suit demanded that the octroi contractor be paid, on payment of 5% octroi. Is entitled. The goods imported by the defendant into the relevant area and his defendant were obliged to pay the stipend during the contract of P elentuff beginning from 1 7 1997 to 30 6 1998. Miltiff's column was claimed by the plaintiff to have been reported that the goods imported on 12 2 1981 were exempt from duty / tax etc. and that the revised schedule was published in the Gazette on 24 1 1998, under which the defendants Imported goods were liable to pay Zakat pay, was forged and the notification issued in this regard was also a forged document which the defendant claimed to have done at a particular time. If the mortgage was not payable, then the payable effect could not be paid through the notification with effect, on the 19th of the year. The stipend was not payable by the defendants, 80% on imported goods, but through a fake notification, Maltrif paid Zakat pay on the imported goods by the defendant, which was previously declared exempt from such octroi. I tried to make the information useful by the respondent, it could not be removed. Subsequently, a prior notification process was issued which resulted in the plaintiff's request to file an application under O VII, R 11, CPC and the pLalnt was rejected. advocate for immigration from Kohlu lawyer