Find a Lawyer

FIDA HUSSAIN JAVED versus DIRECTOR FOOD, PUNJAB

R4 (1) (b) Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 1212 (3) was applied to forced applicants and recovery of money from applicants and two others. ? Based on the evidence collected during the Investigation Service Tribunal, the officers dismissed the appeals filed by the applicants, but appeals from other officers were accepted despite the notice and publication being published in the press, Had deliberately avoided taking part in the disciplinary proceedings. Candidates were essentially retired as a result of a supplemental review conducted by a competent authority regarding their performance, which was not found on the board, such assessment fell into special jurisdiction. The Department of Investigation proved to be the result, which was otherwise. This would not have been possible without the co-operation of the applicants, who had signed the extradition documents, which, after a comprehensive investigation, determined the fact of having relied on excessive wheat reserves, The charge was retained by the Service Tribunal which has led to the record against the other two officers, but they have been denied the charge. It would be gross discrimination, the court dismissed the petition filed by the petitioners and refused to allow these two other officers to appeal with the request of the directive because the service tribunal's decisions were passed in their favor ( Apparently not according to the evidence). During the inquiry against them was collected on the basis of which the applicants advocate for immigration from Guddu lawyer