MESSRS ATIF BUILDERS PVT. LTD. versus GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
In the writings of Article 199 mandamus, the petitioners were alleged that they had deposited huge sums of money with the authority long before to allocate the land, but the scheme of planning for allotment and other formal plans was not finalized. Was being given when the Development Authority transferred the underground land. To the relevant authority, the applicants were not found entitled to land allotment / lease in the queries; the applicants had indicated that they would be satisfied with the refund of the money deposited by them, yet the applicant. The refund was decided on, but the refund was not to be refused by the Authority for payment of a recognized liability more than sixteen years ago which was formally aided by the High Court in this case. , For such informal authority to collect the amount of citizens who lived more than sixteen years ago. The capture was ridiculous. Authority directed to attach immovable properties unless a check is submitted to the court under an assumption that if the period is not submitted within the stipulated period, the order of attachment will be effective immediately. And the Authority will pay a 14 percent annualized payment for further delays.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
advocate from Baroute lawyer