ASIMULLAH KHAN versus IHSAN ULLAH KHAN
The eighth, R10 and OIX, R6, a pre-emption order that was not scheduled for hearing, was not present on the Presiding Officer's Court on the date on which the defendant filed a written statement. Was set for The presiding officer of the Reader Court of the Court was not available on the postponement date, and on the reader's note, the case was adjourned and posted for a later date, but in that date the former party decree was granted against the defendant. Was the date on which the order was passed against the defendant, due to the absence of a hearing date, no previous order against the defendant could be approved in the said date.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
famous supreme court advocate from Gaggo Mandi lawyer
