Find a Lawyer

AMIR MOINULLAH KHAN versus MST. SABAR JANA

Definition of Section 2 (2 (b) Evidence) The presence of a sole witness at the time of the incident was extremely suspicious as it could not carefully calculate its presence in the nearby floor machine operator which may have been a natural witness of the incident. He was dropped for unnecessary preparation of other witnesses mentioned about witnessing the incident, according to the FIR, which was another machine operator who cast doubt on the prosecution's version. Although it was not seriously disputed by the defense, it would cut both as a double-edged sword. There may be a reason to reduce the crime as well as the false implication statement relates to the location of the incident as given by the sole witness in court, which was quite different from the case given in the FIR. It is not safe to maintain a conviction - keeping the death sentence short on evidence where a witness whose presence at the time of his appearance was absolutely natural was left without any reason and instead to examine a witness. Investigations whose presence was not only unnatural, but also highly suspicious, certainly give rise to speculation that if such a witness If presented, the prosecution charge against the accused for not being beyond any shadow would be dismissed. It is suspected that he was convicted and sentenced by the trial court and the accused was released. lawer from fb area from Shorkot lawyer