Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus THE STATE

Section 498 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 pre-arrest bail, the defendant's grant was not named in the FIR because it was one of the perpetrators of the alleged crime and the first time a by-product The statement came out in this case. About seventeen days after the alleged incident, the complainant revealed in his supplementary statement that he had obtained information about the accused's involvement in the matter through two witnesses because the accused had allegedly committed an extra-judicial confession. Earlier, the investigating officer had made a clear statement, saying that witnesses had not appeared before him nor had he been involved in the investigation yet. The Investigation Officer added that there was no recovery from the suspect's possession. Could not be processed and the accused has also joined the investigation while the complaining party is the same investigating officer. Was unable to attend. He maintained that he did not need the physical custody of the accused for the purpose of investing, in which case the accused's statement regarding his financial involvement in this case could not be made without any basis, according to Investigating Officer Adam The interim arrest warrant was already granted, it was confirmed under circumstances. list of supreme court advocates from FR Bannu lawyer