Find a Lawyer

SHARIFAN BIBI versus NASIM AHMED

O XIV, R 5 and O XLI, R 23 & 115 Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54, which are dismissed under the trial suit, remand for declaration and injunction, Plaintiff Appeal Court Appeals Preferred Appeal: The appellate court set aside the trial court's order and order and the appellate court's decision was revoked in the case seeking remand for the new judgment as per law. , Remand was received due to two cases. Secondly, the evidence in this case was not taken by the trial judge itself, but it has been shown by the Reader's Court of the Court Material of Matter Record that the cases were compiled in the presence of the lawyers of the parties and despite the fact that the case. Pending. After settling the matter for many years, no one has objected that the parties can take advantage of the OXIV's RSS, if any matter is left to the immediate, but no action is taken. The parties were taken over a long period of time which showed that the parties were satisfied with the form, contents and scope of the cases prepared by the trial court and the evidence of their choice before the trial court for their satisfaction. And independently examined witnesses are presented by others. Nevertheless, it cannot be assumed that there were no parties, knowing of the actual dispute involved in the lease, could not complain to the appellate court about this aspect below, and they could not have any one to remand the case. OK online advocate from Kallur Kot lawyer